Predictions
Ongoing probability research with virtual stakes and bankrolls. Compare model and bookmaker probabilities.
Available now includes eligible early Monitoring picks and confirmed picks. Monitoring uses the same selection as the bots; only confirmed publications enter recorded results.
Board
Matches
Al-Diraiyah ClubvAl-RiyadhSaudi Pro League5 won / 8 lost · −3.83u · 13 picks
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.55
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 16
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.53
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 12
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.81
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 42.2%
- Break-even odds
- 2.37
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 141
- Reconstructed matches
- 139
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 88
- Reconstructed matches
- 88
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.75
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 7
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.86
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 157
- Reconstructed matches
- 156
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 52.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.90
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 5
- Reconstructed matches
- 5
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 51.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.94
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 71
- Reconstructed matches
- 69
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.72
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 92
- Reconstructed matches
- 89
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.57
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 90
- Reconstructed matches
- 86
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonAl-TaawounvAl-QadsiahSaudi Pro League14 won / 9 lost · +2.80u · 23 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.5%
- Break-even odds
- 2.02
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 48.8%
- Break-even odds
- 2.05
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 228
- Reconstructed matches
- 223
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 247
- Reconstructed matches
- 238
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.75
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 213
- Reconstructed matches
- 209
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 202
- Reconstructed matches
- 198
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.76
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 42
- Reconstructed matches
- 42
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 50.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.97
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 32
- Reconstructed matches
- 29
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 12
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 44.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.24
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.8%
- Break-even odds
- 2.01
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 24
- Reconstructed matches
- 22
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 47.5%
- Break-even odds
- 2.11
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 50.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.99
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 141
- Reconstructed matches
- 139
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 212
- Reconstructed matches
- 209
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 114
- Reconstructed matches
- 110
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 5
- Reconstructed matches
- 5
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.83
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 129
- Reconstructed matches
- 127
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 9
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 233
- Reconstructed matches
- 227
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityNot yet validated
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 175
- Reconstructed matches
- 172
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonFenerbahçevSK Slavia PrahaUEFA Champions League15 won / 22 lost · −9.31u · 37 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.67
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.80
- Expected value at recommendation
- +16.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.57
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 82.8%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.21
- Expected value at recommendation
- +55.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 109
- Reconstructed matches
- 106
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.59
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 123
- Reconstructed matches
- 119
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 34
- Reconstructed matches
- 34
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 42
- Reconstructed matches
- 42
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.65
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.72
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.60
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 81
- Reconstructed matches
- 81
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.55
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.79
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 48.5%
- Break-even odds
- 2.06
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 46.1%
- Break-even odds
- 2.17
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 27
- Reconstructed matches
- 27
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.84
- Expected value at recommendation
- +29.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 7
- Reconstructed matches
- 7
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.6%
- Break-even odds
- 2.02
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 210
- Reconstructed matches
- 208
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.63
- Expected value at recommendation
- +17.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 65
- Reconstructed matches
- 63
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.57
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 9
- Reconstructed matches
- 9
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.77
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 9
- Reconstructed matches
- 9
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +21.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 53.6%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 149
- Reconstructed matches
- 145
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.80
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 52.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.92
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 33
- Reconstructed matches
- 33
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +21.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.65
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.55
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 17
- Reconstructed matches
- 17
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.52
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 8
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.86
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 12
- Reconstructed matches
- 12
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 76.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.31
- Expected value at recommendation
- +30.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonSabah FKvBorussia DortmundUEFA Champions League18 won / 11 lost · +4.73u · 29 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 404
- Reconstructed matches
- 400
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 98
- Reconstructed matches
- 96
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.65
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 129
- Reconstructed matches
- 124
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.79
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 53.6%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +36.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.54
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 188
- Reconstructed matches
- 184
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.75
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 57
- Reconstructed matches
- 56
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +24.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 92
- Reconstructed matches
- 91
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 88
- Reconstructed matches
- 87
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 79
- Reconstructed matches
- 79
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 51.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.93
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.65
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.79
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 56.7%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.77
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 5
- Reconstructed matches
- 5
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 212
- Reconstructed matches
- 209
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.76
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 57.3%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.75
- Expected value at recommendation
- +24.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 135
- Reconstructed matches
- 133
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 51.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.94
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 171
- Reconstructed matches
- 168
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.5%
- Break-even odds
- 2.02
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 52.5%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.91
- Expected value at recommendation
- +19.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 71
- Reconstructed matches
- 69
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 49
- Reconstructed matches
- 46
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.51
- Expected value at recommendation
- +26.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 64
- Reconstructed matches
- 63
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 44
- Reconstructed matches
- 44
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 73
- Reconstructed matches
- 73
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +17.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 78
- Reconstructed matches
- 78
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 51
- Reconstructed matches
- 48
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.65
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 8
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonAl-NassrvNeom SCSaudi Pro League3 won / 16 lost · −13.90u · 19 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 247
- Reconstructed matches
- 238
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.67
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 42
- Reconstructed matches
- 42
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 81
- Reconstructed matches
- 81
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 24
- Reconstructed matches
- 22
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.50
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 68.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.47
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 68.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.47
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 224
- Reconstructed matches
- 218
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 129
- Reconstructed matches
- 127
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 89
- Reconstructed matches
- 86
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.83
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 183
- Reconstructed matches
- 178
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 9
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.53
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 392
- Reconstructed matches
- 386
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.60
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 290
- Reconstructed matches
- 285
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.60
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 175
- Reconstructed matches
- 172
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 233
- Reconstructed matches
- 227
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 182
- Reconstructed matches
- 179
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonWolverhamptonvPortsmouthChampionship17 won / 7 lost · +7.17u · 24 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 16
- Reconstructed matches
- 16
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 72.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.38
- Expected value at recommendation
- +32.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +23.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 12
- Reconstructed matches
- 12
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.51
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 26
- Reconstructed matches
- 26
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 17
- Reconstructed matches
- 17
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 50.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.97
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 73.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.36
- Expected value at recommendation
- +21.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.83
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 26
- Reconstructed matches
- 26
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 68.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.45
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.47
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 152
- Reconstructed matches
- 147
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 51.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.93
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 152
- Reconstructed matches
- 147
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 22
- Reconstructed matches
- 22
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.88
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 29
- Reconstructed matches
- 29
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 47.8%
- Break-even odds
- 2.09
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 20
- Reconstructed matches
- 20
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.71
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 81
- Reconstructed matches
- 81
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 71.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.40
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 50.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.97
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 157
- Reconstructed matches
- 156
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.78
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 33
- Reconstructed matches
- 33
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.51
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 7
- Reconstructed matches
- 7
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 46.8%
- Break-even odds
- 2.14
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 145
- Reconstructed matches
- 140
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.65
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.71
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonManchester CityvAEK AthensUEFA Champions League18 won / 23 lost · −6.19u · 41 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 50
- Reconstructed matches
- 50
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 38.5%
- Break-even odds
- 2.59
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.50
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 50.2%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 2.00
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +17.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 90
- Reconstructed matches
- 88
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 94
- Reconstructed matches
- 92
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.59
- Expected value at recommendation
- +19.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 93
- Reconstructed matches
- 91
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 109
- Reconstructed matches
- 106
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 123
- Reconstructed matches
- 119
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 34
- Reconstructed matches
- 34
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.59
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 92
- Reconstructed matches
- 91
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.60
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.55
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.72
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 38
- Reconstructed matches
- 38
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.76
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.60
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.59
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 45.2%
- Break-even odds
- 2.21
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 42.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.34
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 27
- Reconstructed matches
- 27
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.84
- Expected value at recommendation
- +29.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 12
- Reconstructed matches
- 12
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 53
- Reconstructed matches
- 51
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.48
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 100
- Reconstructed matches
- 100
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 52.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.89
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.3%
- Break-even odds
- 2.03
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 9
- Reconstructed matches
- 9
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +21.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 179
- Reconstructed matches
- 175
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 56.7%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.77
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 149
- Reconstructed matches
- 145
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.67
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 52.7%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.90
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 33
- Reconstructed matches
- 33
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.51
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.60
- Expected value at recommendation
- +23.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.51
- Expected value at recommendation
- +21.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 8
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 51.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.94
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 37
- Reconstructed matches
- 35
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.63
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonLiverpoolvVillarrealUEFA Champions League30 won / 9 lost · +17.57u · 39 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 404
- Reconstructed matches
- 400
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 98
- Reconstructed matches
- 96
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 129
- Reconstructed matches
- 124
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 123
- Reconstructed matches
- 119
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.78
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.65
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 42
- Reconstructed matches
- 42
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.79
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 81
- Reconstructed matches
- 81
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 68.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.47
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 50.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.99
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.01
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 27
- Reconstructed matches
- 27
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +26.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 68
- Reconstructed matches
- 66
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 69.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.45
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 47.9%
- Break-even odds
- 2.09
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 47.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.10
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.79
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 57.0%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.76
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 9
- Reconstructed matches
- 9
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 89
- Reconstructed matches
- 86
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 57.2%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.75
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 104
- Reconstructed matches
- 100
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.55
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 52.2%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.92
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 149
- Reconstructed matches
- 145
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 50.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.99
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 54.0%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.86
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.65
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 17
- Reconstructed matches
- 17
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.51
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.52
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 8
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 50.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.99
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 8
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.86
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 12
- Reconstructed matches
- 12
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 76.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.31
- Expected value at recommendation
- +30.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonRomavŠK Slovan BratislavaUEFA Champions League11 won / 14 lost · −5.14u · 25 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 129
- Reconstructed matches
- 124
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.79
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.54
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.63
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 50.1%
- Break-even odds
- 2.00
- Expected value at recommendation
- +16.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.01
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.50
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 51.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.93
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 27
- Reconstructed matches
- 27
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.63
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 56.6%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.77
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.75
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 63.5%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 9
- Reconstructed matches
- 9
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.82
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.50
- Expected value at recommendation
- +19.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 57.8%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 60.3%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.84
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 49
- Reconstructed matches
- 46
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 69.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.44
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 49
- Reconstructed matches
- 46
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.54
- Expected value at recommendation
- +27.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 51
- Reconstructed matches
- 48
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.72
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 37
- Reconstructed matches
- 35
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 51
- Reconstructed matches
- 48
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 68
- Reconstructed matches
- 66
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.63
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonParis Saint-GermainvBarcelonaUEFA Champions League30 won / 2 lost · +25.13u · 32 picks
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +17.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.57
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 188
- Reconstructed matches
- 184
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 57
- Reconstructed matches
- 56
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 68.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.47
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 42
- Reconstructed matches
- 42
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.57
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 81
- Reconstructed matches
- 81
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 52.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.91
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.01
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 44.1%
- Break-even odds
- 2.27
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 27
- Reconstructed matches
- 27
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 52.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.90
- Expected value at recommendation
- +31.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 58.8%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.70
- Expected value at recommendation
- +29.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.75
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 67.3%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +31.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 9
- Reconstructed matches
- 9
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.71
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.52
- Expected value at recommendation
- +19.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 60.0%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.67
- Expected value at recommendation
- +27.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 179
- Reconstructed matches
- 175
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 52.4%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.91
- Expected value at recommendation
- +16.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 149
- Reconstructed matches
- 145
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.8%
- Break-even odds
- 2.01
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 54.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.84
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 149
- Reconstructed matches
- 147
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 48.3%
- Break-even odds
- 2.07
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 149
- Reconstructed matches
- 145
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 33
- Reconstructed matches
- 33
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.57
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 17
- Reconstructed matches
- 17
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.51
- Expected value at recommendation
- +16.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 8
- Reconstructed matches
- 8
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 12
- Reconstructed matches
- 12
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 75.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.32
- Expected value at recommendation
- +32.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonFC PortovPSV EindhovenUEFA Champions League8 won / 25 lost · −18.07u · 33 picks
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 63.3%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +39.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 90
- Reconstructed matches
- 88
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 52.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.90
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 60.5%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 123
- Reconstructed matches
- 119
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.80
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 34
- Reconstructed matches
- 34
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.59
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.67
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 81
- Reconstructed matches
- 81
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.9%
- Break-even odds
- 2.00
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.01
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 44.1%
- Break-even odds
- 2.27
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 41.5%
- Break-even odds
- 2.41
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 27
- Reconstructed matches
- 27
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 75.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.33
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 43.9%
- Break-even odds
- 2.28
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 7
- Reconstructed matches
- 7
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 52.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.90
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 68
- Reconstructed matches
- 66
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.48
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 47.9%
- Break-even odds
- 2.09
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 47.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.10
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 210
- Reconstructed matches
- 208
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 29
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.50
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 224
- Reconstructed matches
- 218
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.67
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 65
- Reconstructed matches
- 63
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.50
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.61
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.50
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 89
- Reconstructed matches
- 86
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.72
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 149
- Reconstructed matches
- 145
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 6
- Reconstructed matches
- 6
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.78
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 33
- Reconstructed matches
- 33
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 70.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.41
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 49
- Reconstructed matches
- 46
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.52
- Expected value at recommendation
- +26.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 17
- Reconstructed matches
- 17
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.73
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 51
- Reconstructed matches
- 48
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonNapolivBodø/GlimtUEFA Champions League21 won / 4 lost · +14.55u · 25 picks
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 56.4%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.78
- Expected value at recommendation
- +43.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 212
- Reconstructed matches
- 206
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.71
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 62.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.60
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 54.5%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.84
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 57
- Reconstructed matches
- 56
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 68.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.47
- Expected value at recommendation
- +22.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.72
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 42
- Reconstructed matches
- 42
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.57
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.52
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.67
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 81
- Reconstructed matches
- 81
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.4%
- Break-even odds
- 2.02
- Expected value at recommendation
- +16.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 49.7%
- Break-even odds
- 2.01
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 27
- Reconstructed matches
- 27
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 72.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.38
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 7
- Reconstructed matches
- 7
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 60.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.66
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 65
- Reconstructed matches
- 63
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.54
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 210
- Reconstructed matches
- 208
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.59
- Expected value at recommendation
- +7.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 17
- Reconstructed matches
- 17
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.52
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 37
- Reconstructed matches
- 35
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 57.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +9.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 51
- Reconstructed matches
- 48
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.76
- Expected value at recommendation
- +16.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 51
- Reconstructed matches
- 48
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.54
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonVfB StuttgartvAtlético MadridUEFA Champions League12 won / 13 lost · −3.22u · 25 picks
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 55.5%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.81
- Expected value at recommendation
- +27.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 45
- Reconstructed matches
- 45
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.64
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 188
- Reconstructed matches
- 184
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.80
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 57
- Reconstructed matches
- 56
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 69.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.44
- Expected value at recommendation
- +21.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.72
- Expected value at recommendation
- +10.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.3%
- Break-even odds
- 1.78
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 14
- Reconstructed matches
- 14
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 42
- Reconstructed matches
- 42
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.52
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.71
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 10
- Reconstructed matches
- 10
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.69
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 18
- Reconstructed matches
- 18
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +14.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 30
- Reconstructed matches
- 30
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 51.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.95
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.5%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 27
- Reconstructed matches
- 27
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 59.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +24.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 7
- Reconstructed matches
- 7
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 53
- Reconstructed matches
- 51
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.56
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 68
- Reconstructed matches
- 66
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 56.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.77
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 5
- Reconstructed matches
- 5
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 51.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.93
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 224
- Reconstructed matches
- 218
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 58.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.71
- Expected value at recommendation
- +11.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 104
- Reconstructed matches
- 100
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 64.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.55
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 11
- Reconstructed matches
- 11
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 66.1%
- Break-even odds
- 1.51
- Expected value at recommendation
- +21.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 17
- Reconstructed matches
- 17
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.2%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +20.9%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 15
- Reconstructed matches
- 15
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 65.7%
- Break-even odds
- 1.52
- Expected value at recommendation
- +18.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 13
- Reconstructed matches
- 13
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 61.9%
- Break-even odds
- 1.62
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityMore evidence needed
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
More settled forecasts from later matches are needed.
- Unseen matches
- 0
- Validation rounds
- 0
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 12
- Reconstructed matches
- 12
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 75.5%
- Break-even odds
- 1.32
- Expected value at recommendation
- +32.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonLondrinavCuiabáBrasileirão Série B3 won / 1 lost · +1.02u · 4 picks
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 51.5%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.95
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonProvider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityAssessment unavailable
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 44
- Reconstructed matches
- 44
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 67.0%
- Break-even odds
- 1.49
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityAssessment unavailable
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 281
- Reconstructed matches
- 281
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityAssessment unavailable
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 73
- Reconstructed matches
- 73
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 63.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.58
- Expected value at recommendation
- +6.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonCD GuadalajaravClub NecaxaLiga MX, Apertura0 won / 2 lost · −2.00u · 2 picks
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 51.9%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.93
- Expected value at recommendation
- +73.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonPrediction qualityAssessment unavailable
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 193
- Reconstructed matches
- 193
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 53.4%
- Break-even odds
- 1.87
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonAtlético San LuisvQuerétaro FCLiga MX, Apertura1 won / 0 lost · +0.80u · 1 pick
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityAssessment unavailable
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 55
- Reconstructed matches
- 55
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 55.6%
- Break-even odds
- 1.80
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonFC JuárezvAtlante FCLiga MX, Apertura0 won / 1 lost · −1.00u · 1 pick
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 56.1%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.79
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonTigres UANLvClub LeónLiga MX, Apertura0 won / 1 lost · −1.00u · 1 pick
Provider statistics · StatsGem grading
Prediction qualityAssessment unavailable
Quality measures forecast reliability. Expected value uses the offered odds.
A validated quality assessment is not available.
- Unseen matches
- —
- Validation rounds
- —
Each validation round learns from earlier matches and checks later matches.
- Earlier matches
- 55
- Reconstructed matches
- 55
- Lineup
- Official
- Quality calibration
- Not yet measured
- Forecast stability
- Not yet measured
This recorded pick has a result.
- Estimated chance
- 52.8%
- Break-even odds
- 1.89
- Expected value at recommendation
- +0.8%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonSelected day
Tue, 20 Oct 2026
All dates
Overall results
One unit per pick. Includes historical estimates at reference odds (1,895 settled). Display only; recorded performance and benchmarks exclude estimates. Recorded results: 28 Sept 2026 – 21 Oct 2026.
How to read this board
A simulated selection is one match, statistic, scope and direction. Bookmaker prices are alternatives for comparison, not additional stakes.
Results use one virtual unit per recorded selection at its recorded line and odds. The comparison bookmaker is labelled on each selection. These are simulated returns; no real money is wagered or won.
Earlier matches without a saved pre-match recommendation are labelled Historical estimate. They remain visible in the calendar and are excluded from daily and overall results.
Free and VIP use the same process. Their labels reflect the benchmark rules; one day's return cannot determine which will perform better.
Telegram reads these same recommendations and applies your tier, bookmaker preferences and delivery time. A message does not create an additional pick.