Predictions
Ongoing probability research with virtual stakes and bankrolls. Compare model and bookmaker probabilities.
Available now includes eligible early Monitoring picks and confirmed picks. Monitoring uses the same selection as the bots; only confirmed publications enter recorded results.
Board
Matches
Al-HazemvNeom SCSaudi Pro League6 won / 3 lost · +3.04u · 9 picks
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 53.0%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.89
- Expected value at recommendation
- +15.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 53.0%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.89
- Expected value at recommendation
- +4.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 55.7%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.80
- Expected value at recommendation
- +25.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 57.8%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +30.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 56.7%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.77
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.4%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 51.0%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.96
- Expected value at recommendation
- +2.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 52.4%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.91
- Expected value at recommendation
- +3.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 57.8%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.74
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 51.1%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.96
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonAl-EttifaqvAl-KhaleejSaudi Pro League0 won / 4 lost · −4.00u · 4 picks
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 57.1%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.76
- Expected value at recommendation
- +21.1%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 52.6%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.91
- Expected value at recommendation
- +13.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 50.1%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 2.00
- Expected value at recommendation
- +5.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 54.1%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.85
- Expected value at recommendation
- +8.2%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonAl-HilalvAl-IttihadSaudi Pro League2 won / 3 lost · −1.10u · 5 picks
This recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 51.4%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.95
- Expected value at recommendation
- +1.3%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 65.6%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.53
- Expected value at recommendation
- +24.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 70.3%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.43
- Expected value at recommendation
- +40.7%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 58.7%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.71
- Expected value at recommendation
- +12.0%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonThis recorded pick has a result.
- Model chance at recommendation
- 59.8%
- Minimum qualifying odds
- 1.68
- Expected value at recommendation
- +19.6%
Bookmaker prices and pick details
Load bookmaker comparisons and the recommendation record.
Open complete comparisonSelected day
Sat, 10 Oct 2026
All dates
Overall results
One unit per pick. Includes historical estimates at reference odds (2 settled). Display only; recorded performance and benchmarks exclude estimates. Recorded results: 9 Oct 2026 – 20 Oct 2026.
How to read this board
A simulated selection is one match, statistic, scope and direction. Bookmaker prices are alternatives for comparison, not additional stakes.
Results use one virtual unit per recorded selection at its recorded line and odds. The comparison bookmaker is labelled on each selection. These are simulated returns; no real money is wagered or won.
Earlier matches without a saved pre-match recommendation are labelled Historical estimate. They remain visible in the calendar and are excluded from daily and overall results.
Free and VIP use the same process. Their labels reflect the benchmark rules; one day's return cannot determine which will perform better.
Telegram reads these same recommendations and applies your tier, bookmaker preferences and delivery time. A message does not create an additional pick.